Sen. Barack Obama has done it again. As noted yesterday, in an op-ed in the New York Times, Obama changed his explanation on his opposition to the surge. For the past year and a half, Obama has claimed that the surge wouldn't work, would actually increase violence and would get more Americans killed.
Now that that prediction has proven woefully incorrect, Obama says that he opposed the surge all along because it would cost more money, divert attention from Afghanistan and further strain the military.
After Obama's op-ed, his handlers discovered that his Web site still touted the "old" Obama positions -- no more.
GatewayPundit has the inconvenient screenshots.
When all you're running on is "judgment," you can't ever admit it was faulty.