Religion and Politics

Matthew Hoy
By Matthew Hoy on March 27, 2016

I'm generally not enthusiastic about politicians invoking their religion as either a sword or a shield in election battles. Most of the time it's unseemly, and, considering what one generally has to do to make the national stage as a politician, it's largely a façade.

In the 2004 Democratic primary, former New Hampshire Gov. Howard Dean planned to make a point of his religion in an effort to win southern states. On Christmas Day 2003, Dean posted a holiday message to his campaign blog that contained neither the words "Christ," "Jesus," nor "Christmas." Now, this isn't definitive, but it should tell you something about the candidate's religiosity.

Similarly, Donald Trump claims to be a Christian (The Best. Jesus, good guy. Great teacher.), but by his own words and even the most basic knowledge of Christian doctrine, it's clear the man is a charlatan. (Why far too many evangelicals apparently can't see this, according to the polls, leads me to believe some more time needs to be spent educating people from the pulpit.)

Politics and Religion
Marco Rubio gives his concession speech March 15, 2016.

Marco Rubio, on the other hand, strikes me as a sincere and thoughtful Christian. (For the record, he was one of several GOP candidates that I could've happily supported in November.) At the end of his concession speech two weeks ago where he suspended his campaign, Rubio closed on an extended quote from the Bible. (Complete transcript available here.)

This struck me as sincere, but one of my former colleagues at The Daily World many moons ago who is now at Time magazine, disagreed. That's fair enough, but what he really demonstrated was that he, like far too many in the media have only a cursory knowledge of Christian doctrine.


Beckwith then referenced Matthew 6:5.


If you've read the transcript link above or watched the speech, it's clear that Rubio wasn't praying, he was preaching.

This prompted the following exchange.

Politics and Religion

Politics and Religion

Politics and Religion

Now, there's certainly scriptural admonitions against pride and flaunting one's religiosity, but Rubio's speech certainly didn't strike me that way. I don't know of a major Christian denomination that only preaches to the "devout" and you've got to be devout before you read a Bible to decide for yourself. (See the "Great Commission.")

If that sounds confused, that's because it is. For far too many journalists their knowledge of Christianity—even in the best case scenario—is a few yards wide and a fraction of an inch deep.

If you don't like Rubio or any other politician talking about their religion, fine. Say that. But don't go hunting for a verse you heard something about sometime and toss it out like you're a seminarian.

I like Ryan Beckwith. From what I've seen of his work, I think he does a much better job than most about keeping his personal biases out of his coverage. But when it comes to religion, he's like far too many of his colleagues, under-educated.

Religion and politics shouldn't often mix, but we shouldn't slam sincere expressions of faith by politicians, like that of Marco Rubio.


In a just world, SB 918 and its New York counterpart would make the Supreme Court* say: "well, we tried to let you keep shall issue, but you morons just couldn't help yourselves, so now constitutional carry is the law of the land".

*Hopefully it doesn't need to go to SCOTUS.

New talking points just dropped in WaPo -- if that's the excuse for the raid, how does the FBI also justify letting Clinton skate when she also had docs "classified at the highest classification level"?

The most dramatic consequences of government intervention occurred in Sri Lanka, where a 2021 fertilizer ban led to a massive reduction in yields, sparking starvation and an economic crisis that brought down the government in July.

Load More


March 2016



pencil linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram