What the First Amendment means
By Matthew Hoy on May 18, 2010
Cass Sunstein, a leftist professor and President Obama’s regulatory czar, thinks that government should require bloggers like me to link to opposing viewpoints.
Just out of curiosity, where the h-e-double-hockeysticks does some government bureaucrat get off thinking that he can force me to promote opposing views?
5 comments on “What the First Amendment means”
Tags
[custom-twitter-feeds headertext="Hoystory On Twitter"]
This guy is a total nut job. I can't believe that clear-thinking people would ever consider this a good idea.
It's a silly idea for many reasons. But I suspect that I, as a conservative blogger, would find this far less onerous than lefty bloggers. I welcome debate, and I'd guess that other right-wing crazies would too. Bring it on!
Of course if there really was some government "mandate," we would discover that all the lefty-bloggers are really centrists and moderates, and therefore they would not be required to provide links to opposing views.
It's a silly idea for many reasons. But I suspect that I, as a conservative blogger, would find this far less onerous than lefty bloggers. I welcome debate, and I'd guess that other right-wing crazies would too. Bring it on!
Of course if there really was some government "mandate," we would discover that all the lefty-bloggers are really centrists and moderates, and therefore they would not be required to provide links to opposing views.
This guy is a total nut job. I can't believe that clear-thinking people would ever consider this a good idea.
It's a silly idea for many reasons. But I suspect that I, as a conservative blogger, would find this far less onerous than lefty bloggers. I welcome debate, and I'd guess that other right-wing crazies would too. Bring it on!
Of course if there really was some government "mandate," we would discover that all the lefty-bloggers are really centrists and moderates, and therefore they would not be required to provide links to opposing views.