Don't expect any inconvenient questions

Matthew Hoy
By Matthew Hoy on May 13, 2008

President George W. Bush has gotten hammered for years by many in the media for his religious beliefs. While Bush is positively secular in comparison to many presidents pre-Truman -- take a look at some of FDR's speeches, not to mention Abraham Lincoln's -- that hasn't stopped many on the left from vilifying him.

"Christianist" and "Christianism" have become the loaded terms of choice for use not only by the secular left, but also the religious left. Bestselling books have been written warning of the incipient doom that would come to all when a conservative Christians took hold of power. One wag (I'm pretty sure it was "American Fascists" author Chris Hedges, but don't hold me to that) even posited that if the late Rev. Jerry Falwell had become president one of his first moves would be to have all homosexuals executed.

President Bill Clinton, though he often spoke in religious terms, did not garner this kind of outrage or scaremongering in the mainstream media. Why? I've got two theories on that. First, a lot of God-talk can be forgiven if your policies are the "right" ones. Second, I think a lot of people in the media didn't think that Clinton really meant it, as evidenced by his serial philandering.

Which brings us to the current presidential race. Remember, Gov. Mike Huckabee's Christmas ad that had a "floating cross" which was actually a bookshelf. There was tons of media coverage and charges from the left that this was some sort of secret appeal to conservative Christians. The funny thing is, a big part of Huckabee's campaign was his overt appeals to conservative Christians -- all of the sudden the was going covert?

Which brings us to this mailer Sen. Barack Obama is sending out in Kentucky.

If John McCain had done this, there would be howls from the mainstream media. Expect this to register nary a blip.


To be clear, it's still a 1A violation even as they supposedly intended it. But their rush to pass it made it encompass all sorts of stuff.

The judge should not take them at their word that they will "fix" it. The judge should issue the preliminary injunction we requested.

16-year-old Lola Fitzgerald has been racking up skeet shooting championships in and out of her home state. Now a new California law has shut her out of the sport and is threatening her Olympic hopes.

In a just world, SB 918 and its New York counterpart would make the Supreme Court* say: "well, we tried to let you keep shall issue, but you morons just couldn't help yourselves, so now constitutional carry is the law of the land".

*Hopefully it doesn't need to go to SCOTUS.

Load More


May 2008



pencil linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram