My Letter to the Editor

Matthew Hoy
By Matthew Hoy on March 13, 2018

In response to the editorial published in the San Luis Obispo Tribune a few weeks back, and dissected here, I wrote a letter to the editor. It's been more than two weeks since I sent the letter, and there's no indication that they will be publishing it.

So here it is:

To the editor:

The weakness of the Tribune's gun control editorial becomes obvious quickly when they refuse to honestly describe the views of their opposition. Not a single person wishes to arm "everyone to the teeth," nor force the responsibility of carrying a gun on the unwilling nor make carrying a firearm a condition of employment.

There are plenty of teachers that would, if state law allowed, be willing to defend themselves and their students should a madman come on campus.

As for the Tribune's solution, one wonders if the editors are aware of the full impact of the words they've chosen.

Banning all semi-automatic weapons—not just “assault weapons”—would include the vast majority of handguns sold over the past 50 years and probably 80% of all rifles. It’s such an extreme position, that just this past weekend Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), one of the most ardent gun-control advocates in the Senate disavowed it.

Estimates put the number of firearms in America at 300+ million.

The Tribune wants to ban at least one-third of them. Remember all those assurances that “no one is coming for your guns?” The Tribune reveals that is a lie.

Matthew Hoy
Paso Robles

I don't know for sure why the Tribune declined to publish this letter. It comes in under their 200-word ceiling.

What I suspect is that the Tribune really didn't understand the full impact of calling for a "semi-automatic weapons" ban and didn't want their ignorance on the issue called out.

This doesn't come as a surprise; journalists are some of the most thin-skinned people in public life.


SEN. LANKFORD: "Can you help me get a good definition of 'birthing people?'"

BECERRA: "We're trying to be precise in the language that's used."

SEN. LANKFORD: "Mom is a pretty good word. That's worked for a while."

Ummm...who elected her? Is there something wrong with the guy we did elect? What do we pay the FLOTUS? A "United States government official"?

Jill Biden@FLOTUS

Prepping for the G7.

One of the most frightening articles I've ever read.

So, @SLOTribune columnist and local Democratic party apparatchik Tom Fulks was on local radio last night and told listeners that the difference between the Democratic and Republican parties is that the Democratic Party wants to help people and the GOP wants to hurt people 1/

Load More...


March 2018



pencil linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram