Scientists as televangelists

Matthew Hoy
By Matthew Hoy on January 22, 2007

You want to get money from the public? Televangelists have often known one way to get the money to roll in is to put the fear of God into viewers. Oral Roberts famously warned his followers that if he didn't raise enough money, God was going to call him home. Unfortunately, Roberts was either wrong or God reneged and Roberts survived.

Climate scientists have been doing the same thing for decades -- first with the "next Ice Age" and now with global warming. Just ask yourself this question: If the Earth's warming was overwhelmingly a natural occurence that had happened numerous times before, would scientists be getting boatloads of grant money to study it?

The answer is self evident, and now some scientists are beginning to wonder whether their tales of incipient doom have had the unforseen consequence of shooting their credibility in the foot.

In their efforts to capture the public's attention, then, have climate scientists oversold global warming? It's probably not a majority view, but a few climate scientists are beginning to question whether some dire predictions push the science too far.

"Some of us are wondering if we have created a monster," says Kevin Vranes, a climate scientist at the University of Colorado.

I encourage you to read the entire article and consider whether the science is at the heart of climate research nowadays or whether it is the quest for ever more grant money. I also wanted to point out this gem near the end of the story:

Would junior scientists feel compelled to mute their findings, out of concern for their careers, if the research contradicts the climate change consensus?

"I can understand how a scientist without tenure can feel the community pressures," says environmental scientist Roger Pielke Jr., a colleague of Vranes' at the University of Colorado.

Pielke says he has felt pressure from his peers: A prominent scientist angrily accused him of being a skeptic, and a scientific journal editor asked him to "dampen" the message of a peer-reviewed paper to derail skeptics and business interests.

Does this sound like science, religion or just a scam?

0 comments on “Scientists as televangelists”

  1. Anybody remember the 80's: "By the year 2000, New York will be under water" Governments are going to need to move fast on curbing CO2, otherwise when the earth starts cooling again with the still increasing levels of CO2, they wont have any justification for their power grab.

  2. “Nobody is interested in solutions if they don't think there's a problem. Given that starting point, I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the audience to listen to what the solutions are...”

    Al Gore (discussing his movie, ‘An Inconvenient Truth’) in ‘Grist’ Magazine, 5-9-06

    http://www.grist.org/news/maindish/2006/05/09/roberts/

  3. Awesome climate change article by Mark Steyn:
    http://www.suntimes.com/news/steyn/241518,CST-EDT-STEYN04.article

    It includes this great paragraph:
    And, if you really don't like the global weather, wait half-a-millennium. A thousand years ago, the Arctic was warmer than it is now. Circa 982, Erik the Red and a bunch of other Vikings landed in Greenland and thought, "Wow! This land really is green! Who knew?" So they started farming it, and were living it up for a couple of centuries. Then the Little Ice Age showed up, and they all died. A terrible warning to us all about "unsustainable development": If a few hundred Vikings doing a little light hunter-gathering can totally unbalance the environment, imagine the havoc John Edwards' new house must be wreaking.

Tags

[custom-twitter-feeds headertext="Hoystory On Twitter"]

Calendar

January 2007
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Archives

Categories

pencil
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram