Our treaty with al Qaeda

Matthew Hoy
By Matthew Hoy on June 29, 2006

The Supreme Court ruled 5-3 today that al Qaeda is a signatory to the Geneva Conventions -- seriously. Terrorists who wear no uniform and purposefully target civilians are covered by the Geneva Conventions.

What's troubling is that the Court did this in the face of the Detainee Treatment Act passed by the Congress in December. The act "stripped federal courts of jurisdiction over habeas corpus petitions from the Guantanamo Bay detainees 'pending on or after' the date of its enactment." Open and shut, right? Wrong. The Court's liberal majority didn't like that law, so found lame excuses to ignore it.

I'll be spending some serious time reading the opinion, for a prescient analysis on what happened, check out former federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy over at National Review online.

*UPDATE* This might be a boon for Republicans in the 2006 election if this is any indication.

House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi released the following statement today following the United States Supreme Court decision that trying Guantanamo detainees before military commissions violates U.S. law and the Geneva Conventions:

“Today’s Supreme Court decision reaffirms the American ideal that all are entitled to the basic guarantees of our justice system. This is a triumph for the rule of law.

“The rights of due process are among our most cherished liberties, and today’s decision is a rebuke of the Bush Administration’s detainee policies and a reminder of our responsibility to protect both the American people and our Constitutional rights. We cannot allow the values on which our country was founded to become a casualty in the war on terrorism.”

Do Democrats really want to run on the proposition that terrorists captured on the battlefield should get criminal trials with all of the protections that go along with that? This may play well with the left-wing base, but the majority of the Americans know better.

On the bright side, if the Bush administration takes the tack described by Captain Ed, then I suppose I can live with it.

0 comments on “Our treaty with al Qaeda”

  1. It's Not A Pretend War...

    I'm trying to wrap my head around the part of the Hamdan ruling where non-uniformed terrorists who never signed the Geneva Conventions are entitled to protections they will not offer themselves--either to the captured soldiers they torture or the civi...

Tags

To be clear, it's still a 1A violation even as they supposedly intended it. But their rush to pass it made it encompass all sorts of stuff.

The judge should not take them at their word that they will "fix" it. The judge should issue the preliminary injunction we requested.

16-year-old Lola Fitzgerald has been racking up skeet shooting championships in and out of her home state. Now a new California law has shut her out of the sport and is threatening her Olympic hopes. https://thereload.com/the-california-gun-law-dashing-young-female-champions-olympic-dream/

In a just world, SB 918 and its New York counterpart would make the Supreme Court* say: "well, we tried to let you keep shall issue, but you morons just couldn't help yourselves, so now constitutional carry is the law of the land".

*Hopefully it doesn't need to go to SCOTUS.

Load More

Calendar

June 2006
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Archives

Categories

pencil linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram