From a Reuters report on President Bush's second term:

The rest of the world will be watching with anxiety when President Bush is inaugurated Thursday for a second time, fearing the most powerful man on the planet may do more harm than good.

Many world leaders, alienated by Bush's go-it-alone foreign policy and the U.S.-led war in Iraq, would have preferred him to lose the U.S. election last November. [emphasis added]

So which is it? If the foreign policy is "go-it-alone," then who is helping us in our "U.S.-led war in Iraq?"

Once again, the language is battered by an attempt to make a political point.