Dangers of punditry

Matthew Hoy
By Matthew Hoy on March 2, 2011

When you write as many words as a blogger or newspaper columnist does, you’re bound to write something monumentally stupid from time to time. The difference between the two, however, is the multiple layers of editors employed by newspapers. Of course, over the past few years those editors have increasingly found themselves getting unemployment checks and it hurts the credibility of people like The Washington Post’s E.J. Dionne. (via Best of the Web Today)

It's not surprising that left-liberal Washington Post columnist E.J. Dionne sides with unions over taxpayers. This passage from his column yesterday is somewhat surprising, however, for Dionne's ignorance about basic U.S. law:

Last week [Gov. Scott] Walker signed into law a bill that will require a two-thirds supermajority in the legislature, or a statewide referendum, to raise income, sales or corporate franchise taxes. Imagine if President Obama had insisted that a two-thirds majority be required to repeal his health-care law?

In fact, Obama is insisting that a two-thirds majority is required to repeal ObamaCare. Hasn't Dionne ever heard of the presidential veto?

Don’t bother a liberal pundit with facts when there’s a political point to be made!

Tags

[custom-twitter-feeds headertext="Hoystory On Twitter"]

Calendar

March 2011
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Archives

Categories

pencil linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram