VDH vs. NYT

Matthew Hoy
By Matthew Hoy on July 13, 2007

Victor Davis Hanson takes on Sunday's New York Times editorial advocating retreat from Iraq.

I wanted to highlight the absolute moral depravity that appears to be the standard at the Times with this paragraph:

Americans must be clear that Iraq, and the region around it, could be even bloodier and more chaotic after Americans leave. There could be reprisals against those who worked with American forces, further ethnic cleansing, even genocide. Potentially destabilizing refugee flows could hit Jordan and Syria. Iran and Turkey could be tempted to make power grabs.

The Times editorial writers can no longer plead ignorance. They're perfectly aware at what will likely follow a precipitous U.S. withdrawal -- and they don't care.

Well, maybe they care -- a little bit -- but their "response" to the problem is laughable to say the least.

The administration, the Democratic-controlled Congress, the United Nations and America’s allies must try to mitigate those outcomes — and they may fail.

The U.N. beat a hasty retreat shortly after the fall of Saddam Hussein's government when a suicide bomber blew up the U.N. mission, killing their top diplomat. And the U.N.'s going to want to get involved after we pull out with the Times litany of disaster occurring? What military in the world is going to want to get involved where the U.S. has failed?

0 comments on “VDH vs. NYT”

Tags

[custom-twitter-feeds headertext="Hoystory On Twitter"]

Calendar

July 2007
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Archives

Categories

pencil linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram