It looks like the California Supreme Court uses the Bill Clinton-approved definition of sex -- that is, oral sex isn't.

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A 22-year-old Californian man who received oral sex from a sixteen-year-old girl should not be forced to register for life as a sex offender, the California Supreme Court ruled on Monday.

The state's top court found that California denied Vincent Hofsheier equal protection under the law because those having intercourse in such circumstances would not be forced to register as lifetime sex offenders.

Really the problem here is that California doesn't make intercourse with a minor illegal. Of course, I don't expect the politicians in Sacramento to fix this problem, because our state politicians have better things to do.