Mind over Media Matters

Matthew Hoy
By Matthew Hoy on March 14, 2006

Media Matters for America is the left-wing answer to Brent Bozell's Media Research Center and is headed by David Brock, the one-time right-wing hatchet man who "saw the light," admitted that he was a liar and became a left-wing hatchet man saint.

I don't often visit Media Matters because they spend much of their time criticizing pundits for not being "fair." While the MRC focuses largely on purportedly unbiased, mainstream news broadcasts, the majority of Media Matters' ire is directed at Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Bill O'Reilly and just about every other conservative commentator.

Something I was reading -- I'm pretty sure that it was OpinionJournal.com's "Best of the Web Today" -- had a link to Brock's baby, so I followed the link and then went to the site's front page where they had this interesting tidbit:

Iraq

Bush

Media ignored Bush's contradictory stance on "timetables" in Iraq
In covering President Bush's March 13 speech, the media reported that Bush effectively laid out a timetable for U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq by setting a "goal of having the Iraqis control more territory than the coalition by the end of 2006," but completely ignored the numerous statements Bush and other administration officials have made denouncing timetables for withdrawal, and attacking those who propose them. Read More

Of course, the explanation for the media ignoring "Bush's contradictory stance," is that they aren't complete morons like the dummies over at Media Matters.I've been counseled before that that it isn't nice to characterize my political foes as "morons," "idiots," or "blithering, idiotic morons," because it's not nice and just because they don't agree with me doesn't make them stupid. True, not agreeing with me doesn't make you stupid, but whoever at Media Matters picked up this gem is stupid.

What Media Matters calls a "timetable" is actually a "plan" -- you know, the thing that Democrats are always complaining that Bush doesn't have. Simply read that direct quote again: Bush has a "goal of having the Iraqis control more territory than the coalition by the end of 2006." A "goal." If you don't meet the "goal" you don't pull out the troops. (We'll set aside the possibility that having Iraqis controlling more territory doesn't necessarily create a situation where we have fewer troops in Iraq. After all, the South Koreans control all of their territory and we still have troops there.) A "timetable," on the other hand, means that on X date you remove Y troops, regardless of the conditions on the ground.

Even the mainstream media can figure this out, but not the geniuses over at Media Matters.

Tags

[custom-twitter-feeds headertext="Hoystory On Twitter"]

Calendar

March 2006
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Archives

Categories

pencil linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram