Archive for February, 2009

28
Feb

Climate change update

The climate continues to change, because that’s what it does.

In actual science related news, a satellite designed to find “missing” C02 didn’t quite make it into orbit this week after the payload fairing failed to separate. The fact that this science even needed to be done is evidence that scientists don’t really explain how the atmosphere works with regard to global warming and C02 — no matter what their models say.

Then, we had the usual scaremongering.

The Earth won’t have to warm up as much as had been thought to cause serious consequences of global warming, including more extreme weather and increasing threats to plants and animals, says an international team of climate experts.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change estimated that the risk of increased severe weather would rise with a global average temperature increase of between 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit and 3.6 degrees above 1990 levels. The National Climatic Data Center currently reports that global temperatures have risen 0.22 degree since 1990.

Of course, the Earth has cooled since 2000. And now that the Earth isn’t warming as much as they were predicting it would just a few years ago, scientists are revising their guesstimates down to make sure that global warming is still an imminent danger.

But even these guys aren’t as bad as British scientist James Lovelock:

Climate change will wipe out most life on Earth by the end of this century and mankind is too late to avert catastrophe, a leading British climate scientist said.

James Lovelock, 89, famous for his Gaia theory of the Earth being a kind of living organism, said higher temperatures will turn parts of the world into desert and raise sea levels, flooding other regions.

His apocalyptic theory foresees crop failures, drought and death on an unprecedented scale. The population of this hot, barren world could shrink from about seven billion to one billion by 2100 as people compete for ever-scarcer resources.

Lovelock, of course, won’t be around to see how spectacularly wrong he is, because judging by his picture he’s well into his advanced years.

Finally, there was some sanity as columnist George Will ably defended the statement that sea ice coverage this year is about the same as it was in 1979 from a bunch of dishonest scaremongers. Sen. John Kerry has challenged him to a debate. They should sell tickets, because it would be a great show.

27
Feb

Adios, Rocky Mountain News

Today the Rocky Mountain News, Colorado’s oldest newspaper, published its final edition. Despite the government incessant efforts to save America’s car companies, banks, investment houses and a seemingly never-ending parade of special interests, newspapers aren’t in line for rescuing.

In the long run, that’s probably a good thing. The way so many in the media pander to wildly popular President Barack Obama nowadays would probably only worsen should he be seen as not just the savior of this nation, but also of their very jobs. The latter hits much closer to home.

The News is the first major newspaper to close. It probably won’t be the last, even if the economy turns around as quickly and as robustly as President Obama’s tremendously optimistic budget plan predicts.

The San Francisco Chronicle, announced earlier this week that it might close or be sold and revealed that the paper is losing $50 million a year. A line in a Wall Street Journal article on the paper’s difficulties suggested that the paper could fire its entire staff and still not be able to cover that shortfall.

What’s wrong with the newspaper industry? Certainly part of it is the general economic downturn hitting the nation. But a big part of it is the same thing that hit the banks and auto industry — incompetent management. How out of whack does your budget have to be that, a la San Francisco Chronicle, you could reduce your payroll to zero and still be in the hole? The Chronicle has reportedly been losing money every year since 2000. How exactly is that possible?

All sorts of solutions have been offered by all sorts of pundits — usually it involves some sort of pay-to-read model that is very unlikely to work absent unprecedented cooperation between most major American newspapers and magazines. However, that horse has probably already left the barn. There’s a whole generation-plus of Americans who are comfortable reading the morning paper online — for free. Newspapers will eventually die as a medium as the baby boomers die out. That’s still a few decades away, but it’s coming. Instead, the news will be delivered electronically, wirelessly.

The key, of course, is finding a way to make it pay.

Advertisers willing to pay tens of thousands of dollars for full page color print advertising are unwilling to pay similar dollars for brief interstitial ads on newspaper Web sites. (Interstitial ads are those that take over your browser for a few seconds and usually have a link in a corner allowing you to skip them. They are the closest Web equivalent to a full page ad.)  Until the day comes where advertisers will pay the big bucks for Web ads, the newspaper industry will continue to shrink. That’s not good news for journalists like me. It’s worse news for our democracy.

26
Feb

Hold on to your wallet

President Barack Obama has unveiled his budget plan, and if you think you’re going to be better off because of it, then you must be on welfare.

First, the spending:

Obama can complain all he wants about “inheriting” a deficit, but what President Bush gave him was chump change compared to what he’s spending.

Second, if you think that he’s going to get all the money he needs to pay for all his plans from “the rich” who make more than $250,000, you’re naive.

A tax policy that confiscated 100% of the taxable income of everyone in America earning over $500,000 in 2006 would only have given Congress an extra $1.3 trillion in revenue. That’s less than half the 2006 federal budget of $2.7 trillion and looks tiny compared to the more than $4 trillion Congress will spend in fiscal 2010. Even taking every taxable “dime” of everyone earning more than $75,000 in 2006 would have barely yielded enough to cover that $4 trillion.

And if you think anyone’s going to work an extra minute if the government is taking 100 percent of what they earn, you’re an idiot.

Where’s the necessary money going to come from? Well, let’s just say that $250,000 floor on people getting tax increases is going to start shedding zeros pretty quick.

If you take a look at some of the tax breaks that are going away and new taxes being created, along with a cap-and-trade program to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, you won’t be the least bit surprised if your energy bills start rising much faster than any other tax breaks from the government appear to cover them.

And, just to show you that nothing has changed since Democrats took over Congress and vowed to drain the swamp of corruption, we have these inconvenient truths: There’s tons of earmarks in this budget — including many first proposed by then Sen. Barack Obama, who as a candidate for president said he was opposed to earmarks. Democrats in the House also quashed a move to force the “ethics committee” to investigate lobbyist-lawmaker ties of the type that have made Rep. John Murtha famous.

Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., sponsored the proposal that would have forced the House Ethics Committee to launch a probe into ties between the source and timing of campaign contributions by lobbyists and subsequent legislator requests for special projects or earmarks.

While open-ended, Flake’s resolution was a direct response to the ongoing federal investigation into the PMA Group, a lobbying company accused of making fraudulent donations to lawmakers using names of people who did not exist. 

The firm, which has contributed millions to politicians in the last decade, has close ties to senior Democratic appropriators including Reps. John Murtha D-Pa., and Pete Visclosky,D-Ind.

The swamp hasn’t been drained; its denizens have changed.

25
Feb

President Obama's speech

I didn’t get a chance to listen to all of President Barack Obama’s speech to a joint session of Congress last night. In between something I like to call “work” and heading off to see the San Diego State men’s basketball team collapse against BYU, I did manage to catch parts of the speech.

Now, I didn’t see it, but I thought I heard it. After Obama said:

I’m proud that we passed the recovery plan free of earmarks, and I want to pass a budget next year that ensures that each dollar we spend reflects only our most important national priorities.

I could’ve sworn there was a round of laughter in the chamber. I assume it came from Republicans. When was the last time a president was laughed at during a joint session of Congress? This isn’t the same as a designed laugh line, President Obama has actually tried to peddle this one before as truth.

We’re a month into Obama’s term and we have yet to see the third-way, post-partisan politican that he campaigned as. We will soon find out if Obama’s “no earmarks” lie about the stimulus plan was a one-off, or if it’s a systemic problem.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid wants the White House to tread lightly on earmarks, saying that any push by the Obama administration to clamp down on pet projects would be met with strong opposition from congressional leaders.

“We cannot let spending be done by a bunch of nameless, faceless bureaucrats,” Reid said, arguing that lawmakers are much more in tune with federal money needs for their states than agencies in Washington.

If the earmarking continues, look for the bloom to come off Obama’s rose and Republicans to do a reprise of 1994.

24
Feb

Obama, Congress to Constitution: Drop Dead

Congress appears poised, and President Barack Obama to sign, a law giving District of Columbia delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton a vote in the House. One notable, and foolish, Republican also supports this effort: Sen. Orrin Hatch. Hatch supports the move because it would give Utah an extra representative — for two years. After that, the extra representative could come from any state in the union based upon the 2010 census.

The problem with this law is that it is blatantly unconstitutional. Representatives come from the states — not the district of the federal city.

The solution to the problem of residents of Washington, D.C., suffering from “Taxation without Representation” is for all residential areas of the capital to be returned to the state from whence they came — Maryland.

Any other effort to give D.C. a vote in Congress, absent a constitutional amendment, is unconstitutional.

23
Feb

Cowardice vs. good judgment

Last week, Attorney General Eric Holder castigated Americans for their cowardice when it came to discussing the issue of race in our society. By the weekend it had become clear to anyone with an ounce of sense that Holder was wrong.

New York Post cartoonist Scott Delonas published this commentary on the recently passed stimulus package:

NYPostCartoon

The cartoon refers to the tragic case of a Connecticut woman who was mauled by a chimpanzee.

For those in the know, the authors of the stimulus bill were Democrats in Congress, primarily House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate majority leader Harry Reid. However, President Barack Obama is a black man, and there is a long history of racists using chimpanzees and other primates as code for blacks — and President George W. Bush. Ipso facto, this is a racist cartoon.

Al Sharpton and the NAACP have both called for Delonas and his editor to be fired. Sharpton has also called for the FCC to investigate the Post’s corporate owner, NewsCorp, over the cartoon. And, as if it was really necessary, the National Association of Black Journalists demonstrated that they are blacks first and journalists eventually.

Barbara Ciara, president of the National Association of Black Journalists, said the Post showed a “serious lapse in judgment” by running the cartoon.

“To think that the cartoonist and the responsible editors at the paper did not see the racist overtones of the finished product should insult their intelligence,” Ciara said in a written statement. “Instead, they celebrate their own lack of perspective and criticize those who call it what it is: tone deaf at best, overtly racist at worst.”

It was left to Anti-American hater Ted Rall of all people to sorta defend Delonas’ journalistic rights.

Rall, who is familiar with Delonas’ work, said he doesn’t believe the cartoonist was saying anything about Obama. “It’s about his economic advisers who wrote the stimulus bill, and they’re a bunch of white guys.”

The Columbia Journalism Review surveyed some cartoonists and the consensus view appeared to be that no one thought Delonas was racist, but that it wasn’t a very good cartoon anyway. That didn’t stop CJR’s Charles Kaiser for dubbing Delonas a “Sinner” and calling him tasteless and stupid.

The second incident last week involved South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford and Rep. James Clyburn, a South Carolina Democrat and House majority whip. I’ll let Clyburn, who is black, speak for himself:

The four governors have said that they might turn down their states’ shares of the $787 billion stimulus bill that Congress passed last week – with almost no Republican support – and that President Barack Obama signed into law Tuesday.

Clyburn said the measure reserved some money for census tracts in which more than one-fifth of the residents had lived at or below the federal poverty level for the last 30 years. He said that 12 of South Carolina’s 46 counties qualified for the targeted aid, all along the impoverished Interstate 95 corridor.

“Now the (South Carolina) governor says, ‘I don’t want to accept the money,’” Clyburn told CNN. “That’s why I called this an insult. That’s why I said this is a slap in the face; because a majority of these counties are, in fact, inhabited by African-Americans.”

Clyburn denies that he’s suggesting Sanford and others are racists, but you don’t have to call someone racist to play the “race card.”

These two incidents have one thing in common — neither of them started out as a discussion about race. They were both political and policy issues, but hypersensitivity to the issue of race by those who traffic in the racial grievance industry is now threatening at least two people’s livelihoods.

Holder calls America a nation of cowards, but it’s not cowardly to refuse to leap out of your trench to cross an open field with the likes of Al Sharpton, James Clyburn and Barbara Ciara manning machine guns. Instead, it’s better for everyone not to stick your head up over the edge and get it shot off.

If Holder really wants to change the way race is discussed in America, he will come out publicly and tell Sharpton, Clyburn and the rest of them to stand down. Of course, America’s first post-racial president would also burnish his credentials in that regard if he too came out and defended Delonas, the Post and Sanford from these cheap, false accusations.

Don’t hold your breath, he too is just another politician.

On a related note: The fear has grown to such a degree that any monkey in any cartoon is now the subject of a pre-emptive apology.

22
Feb

The goal of tax policy

During the 2008 campaign, then-candidate Barack Obama dismissed tax policy as mainly as a method of getting revenue for the government and more as a way to redistribute wealth by making life more “fair.”

Now that Democrats have all the levers of power, you have things like this from Rep. Jerry McNerny (D-Calif.) to look forward to.

When I got my time with him, I explained to him that even people who make $150k in Northern Cal. are not “rich” and should not be taxed as if they were. (A 1400 sq ft, 40 year old home here goes for over half a million, even after the housing slump. Then you add in real estate taxes, state income taxes, 10% sales tax, gas prices, utility costs, etc.) I also expressed my concern that about half the people in the country now pay no income taxes, so there is overwhelming incentive for them to keep voting for democrats and therefore higher taxes for the rest of us. He told me that he thought tax rates should go up for the very rich and that the top marginal tax rate should be 90%. I couldn’t believe what I was hearing, so I asked in a voice that many in the room could hear if he really meant 90%, and he said yes. Several people asked me after my turn was over if they heard correctly what he said, and were amazed when I said yes.

A 90 percent top marginal tax rates would cause economic expansion to slow — or contract. No one in their right mind — and taxpayers are typically right-minded — would want to work an extra hour if it meant that the government took 90 percent of their income for that extra hour.

McNernry doesn’t understand that — and neither do too many Democrats. If you think the economy is bad now, just wait until the top tax rate is 90 percent again.

20
Feb

He knows a coward when he sees one

Attorney General Eric Holder made news this week when he (incorrectly) accused Americans of being too cowardly to talk about race. The real problem is too much talk about race, not too little.

As many have noted, and I’ve personally experienced, talking about race can get you in trouble. Lawyers suggest you not take up Holder’s challenge.

I give the final word on Holder’s assessment about what is cowardly to former federal prosecutor Andy McCarthy:

I can’t help but remember the time when our hero marched right into the Oval Office, looked Clinton squarely in the eye, and said:

“Mr. President, this is just wrong.  You can’t sell a pardon to an international fugitive who defrauded the United States out of millions of dollars and traded with Iran while Khomeini was holding American hostages.  I can’t be a part of this.  I understand you don’t want to hear it, sir, but you need to know the evidence our Justice Department prosecutors have against this guy.  And sure, I know his lawyer — our friend Jack Quinn — might get really angry at me and not help make me the next Attorney General.  But you know, sometimes when you see something that is just so wrong, you have to have the courage to stand up and be counted.  It’s like I told you a year ago while I was almost bitterly objecting and nearly thought about threatening to resign when we pardoned those FALN guys to help Hillary’s campaign in New York:  Though this administration has proudly thought of itself as an ethical melting pot, in things corrupt we have always been and continue to be, in too many ways, essentially an administration of cowards.”

Like I said, “I’m sure Eric will be a superb AG.”

20
Feb

Libel suit settled

Lobbyist Vicki Iseman has settled her libel suit against the New York Times in return for a dishonest clarification.

On Thursday, the two sides released a joint statement saying: “To resolve the lawsuit, Ms. Iseman has accepted The Times’s explanation, which will appear in a Note to Readers to be published in the newspaper on Feb. 20, that the article did not state, and The Times did not intend to conclude, that Ms. Iseman had engaged in a romantic affair with Senator McCain or an unethical relationship on behalf of her clients in breach of the public trust.”

Yeah, because no one reading that article could come to the conclusion that the Times was alleging an affair. No one except for the newspaper’s own ombudsman, Clark Hoyt.

I continue to believe that Iseman had a reasonably good case against the Times. Why she chose not to pursue it we will likely never know.

19
Feb

We should've elected his father

State Sen. Abel Maldonado (R-Tax Hikes) spoke at the GOP convention last year in Denver Minneapolis and told the delegates there that his father, once a sharecropper, knew more about basic economics than Barack Obama.

Based on Maldonado’s vote this morning, the voters should’ve elected Abel’s father. (via Patterico)





Follow Hoystory on Twitter


February 2009
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728  

Themes


  • Support the Cause




  • Hoystory's advertisers


Your Ad Here








Close
E-mail It