Archive for January, 2005

31
Jan

A thought on elections

It appears to be commonplace in other countries that voters are marked somehow as having voted. The image the past few days has been of Iraqi voters with their ink-stained fingers. It appears to me as though we should undertake similar measures here in the United States.

Marking a voter isn’t a cure-all for solving the voter fraud problem. Someone who votes absentee and then shows up at the polls and casts a ballot there wouldn’t be caught with this method. Someone who casts a ballot in two different states would also not be caught using this method.

However, it would stop the kind of voter fraud believed to have occurred in Milwaukee, Wis. Unlike some states, Wisconsin allows same-day registration at polling places. Of course, some form of identification is required — a driver’s license or utility bill will do. But, in an effort to make sure as many people as possible vote, one already registered voter can vouch for any number of others — no ID required.

At least these illegal voters would only be voting once. It’s not perfect, but it would be a good first step.

31
Jan

Yesterday's election

As I flipped channels yesterday and watched the cable channels’ coverage of the historic elections in Iraq, I was impressed by the amount of coverage devoted to the story. Many of the cable channels were running their weekday programming schedule. A time or two I worried that I had slept completely through Sunday and had awakened Monday.

I was happy to hear The Weekly Standard’s Bill Kristol on Fox News’ “Special Report” program address the oft-quoted canard that a Sunni boycott of the elections would somehow make them illegitimate. Kristol countered that the same people (mainly reactionary liberals) making that charge wouldn’t have made a parallel argument if Afrikaaners in South Africa had boycotted the first free elections in that country.

What happened in Iraq yesterday was nothing less than a stunning success. A success for democracy. A success for freedom. And, as much as the Democrat Party would hate to admit it, a success for President Bush.

Unfortunately, that last fact has caused the Democrat Party to abandon its values — and its sanity.

The most-quoted Democrat on Iraq is the senior senator of the state of Massachusetts, Ted Kennedy. Stuck in some sort of time warp, Kennedy continues to claim that Iraq is Vietnam redux — ignoring the obvious differences in the two situations (e.g. we never defeated the NVA, we never occupied North Vietnam, our goal wasn’t to establish a democracy). Kennedy accuses us of losing the battle for the hearts and minds of Iraqis. To whom? Certainly not Zarqawi and his nihlistic, anti-democratic terrorist followers. Even in the Sunni strongholds — the areas of Iraq where the ex-Baathists still hold some sway — turnout appears to have been higher than it has been for many U.S. presidential elections.

We aren’t yet finished in Iraq, but what happened yesterday has forced many Democrats into the politically odious and insane position of rooting for the terrorists. The Joe Liebermans of the Democrat Party are few and far in between — and no longer the heart and soul of that once major party.

On the Internet, postings over at the Democratic Underground Message Boards (aka DUMB) and other assorted leftist sewers are equally anti-democratic. The underlying theme appears to be that nothing good can possibly come out of a democratic Iraq — unless the country’s new leaders adopt an anti-American stance similar to that of, say, France.

Attacks on American soldiers, Iraqi policemen and Iraqi civilians will continue, but that’s what terrorists do.

In the final calculation, yesterday was a very good day.

Democracy is on the march.

30
Jan

Flipping channels

So, 300 channels and there’s nothing on, but I did catch bits of a couple of shows that I would like to share. You see, right now they’re bouncing around in my head killing brain cells and will continue to do so until I can let it out to torture someone else.

First, some channel is showing one of those silly list shows. This one is: “50 hottest Vegas moments.” That’s all I saw — it’s name. I’m thinking. Vegas is in the middle of the desert. What kind of show is this? Hottest Vegas Moment #37: Aug. 24, 2001, 2:01:33 p.m.

Second, another channel is showing a drama of some sort apparently about some people who are stranded in the middle of the ocean in a small inflatable boat. I didn’t get an exact count, but there appear to be six or seven of them. After reading the title of the show, I really don’t care about watching it, because the title ruins it: “Two came back.” Why would you watch that show? Do we really care which of the two survive? I don’t.

30
Jan

On payola

I haven’t been beating the drum of outrage at these opinion columnists who, it was discovered, had been getting money to do public relations for the government. I think it’s a waste of taxpayer funds that are better spent on, well, just about anything. As to the pundits, these payments/government contracts should’ve been disclosed.

Disclose everything.

Having said that, we turn to Washington Post columnist Fred Hiatt who came out with this piece on Saturday entitled “The Rules of Punditry.”

For the most part, I agree with Hiatt’s analysis, but one particular paragraph struck me odd.

So the Gallagher case is murkier. Since the Post story was published, she has described herself both as an “opinion journalist” and as a marriage expert entitled to do consulting work in the field. It seems to me these roles coexist uneasily if the consulting work is for the government.

My question: Why is only consulting work for the government odious for pundits? Why is it somehow less outrageous if someone does consulting work for say, Planned Parenthood, and then goes out and writes columns advocating abortion rights without disclosing that relationship?

30
Jan

Election day

Today is the day Iraqis go to the polls to participate in free elections for the first time in decades. It’s still early in Iraq, but it appears as though the terrorists’ promise to fill the streets with blood has been largely empty.

Check out Steven Vincent’s “In the Red Zone” blog for some thoughts on this momentous day for the Iraqi people and the future of democracy in the Middle East.

28
Jan

I wasn't asked…

… but I would sign it too.

28
Jan

What the meaning of "is" is

From the family that brought you that famous line comes a “clarification” of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s apparently conciliatory remarks on the 32nd anniversary of Roe v. Wade.

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton’s recent remarks on abortion, in which she expressed support for parental notification laws, have provoked concern among some advocates of abortion rights, with one organization asking the senator to clarify her stance on such laws.

The advocates said Mrs. Clinton appeared to be going out of her way to appeal to opponents of abortion with her comments on parental notification, made at a news conference on Monday that followed a speech to about 1,000 supporters of abortion rights.

In response, two of Mrs. Clinton’s aides qualified her support for parental notification laws, saying she preferred an approach like New York’s, which does not require minors seeking abortions to tell their parents, but does provide them with information about their medical options. [emphasis added]

So, let me get this straight. Sen. Clinton supports parental notification laws as long as they don’t require parents to be notified.

But it gets better. After pulling a “Slick Willy” (please define “alone”) move, her aides move her into John “I voted for it before I voted against it” Kerry mode.

Two aides to Mrs. Clinton said yesterday that while she once supported Arkansas’s parental notification law, she now preferred New York’s approach. New York is one of more than a dozen states that do not have a parental notification requirement; instead, health care providers have to give information about medical options and risks to patients, including those seeking abortions.

Hillary moving to the center? Unlikely. However, it would be nice to get the junior senator from New York on the the record on this. Did she mean what she said when she said it, or not?

28
Jan

Stupid graphics

News channels have a kind of sick love affair with flashy, eye-catching graphics that convey little tidbits of information. However, sometimes it’s better to just leave it alone. Just because you can do something, doesn’t mean you should.

27
Jan

Dual format

I just wanted to share with all of you what I just printed out on my printer:

Hello,

I live in the condo below you. I work nights. I would really appreciate it if you would not play your stereo so loud that I can easily sing along to the lyrics so early in the morning.

Thanks,
Matt Hoy

I banged on the door — that didn’t work. May still be in the shower. It’s not as loud in the living room. So I’m going to try to get some more sleep on the couch. $%^&*

27
Jan

Memo to leftists

Evan Coyne Maloney has a new video up from the protests at last week’s presidential inauguration.

One thing the leftists in the video — and those that think like them — might want to consider before they start advocating armed revolution: remember who’s got all of the guns.





Follow Hoystory on Twitter


January 2005
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Themes


  • Support the Cause




  • Hoystory's advertisers


Your Ad Here








Close
E-mail It