Well, you're a Hoystory reader, so you probably can. But it's becoming readily apparent that there's a significant portion of the moonbat left that simply cannot. I've been beating on the liberal Web site truthout.org for nearly a month now (see here, here and here) after they falsely reported that White House advisor had been indicted.

Since then, Rove's lawyer has revealed that he has been sent a letter by special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald indicating that Rove will not be charged with any crime.

This news, reported by every major media outlet on the planet and undisputed by Fitzgerald, has not shaken truthout.org's belief in the veracity of their original report.

After spending the past month retracing our steps and confirming facts, we've come full circle. Our sources continue to maintain that a grand jury has in fact returned an indictment. Our sources said that parts of the indictment were read to Karl Rove and his attorney on Friday, May 12, 2006. Last week, we pointed to a sealed federal indictment, case number "06 cr 128," which is still sealed and we are still pointing to it. During lengthy conversations with our sources over the past month, they reiterated that the substance of our report on May 13, 2006, was correct, and immediately following our report, Karl Rove's status in the CIA leak probe changed. In summary, as we press our investigation we find indicators that more of our key facts are correct, not less.

Reality-based community? I think that there is nothing that can happen to convince these people that their reports are wrong. Nothing. In a month or two this mysterious "06 cr 128" will be unsealed, it'll not contain a word about Karl Rove and Marc Ashwill latch on to a Post-It note attached to a piece of paper found in Jason Leopold's sock drawer.

For a more plausible explanation of what's going on check out this piece over at Stromata Blog.